Skip to main content

Understanding Black face As a Cultural Object in The United States: Post #3

4 questions for blackface minstrelsy:

  1. Why were white audiences so taken in by Blackface minstrelsy in the first place? 

  2. How popular was blackface minstrelsy across globally? Especially to the point where Al Jolson who was from Lithuania, and became the most popular blackface artist of the 20th century?

  3. When did black entertainers feel more confident to compose works unrelated to their pre-disposed harmful stereotypes?

  4. How did the williams and walker company stand out among the rest of black musical theater companies?

These questions came across my mind strongly whilst reading History of Minstrelsy From “Jump Jim Crow” to “The Jazz Singer” but also taking into the concepts from Grazian such as Defining Culture, “to the sociologist, culture refers to a mode of living in the world as a social being, as represented by the shared practices, rituals, behaviors, activities, and artifacts that make up the experience of everyday life.” We know that Rice took these superficial observations of African American Speech, and turned them into a show of mockery of African American slaves, demeaning them. White actors that put on this “Blackface would always be Janus-faced, allowing the artist to speak freely against the interests of the powerful, a potent symbol of Jacksonian democracy. On the other hand, blackface dangerously dehumanized blacks by introducing and reinforcing racial stereotypes. Blackface popularized inaccurate representations of blacks while preventing blacks from representing themselves.”

Minstrel actors thought black face allowed them to hide behind these caricature masks in what they considered an act of retaliation to voice their opinions against authority. As Grazian states “When vast numbers of people invest in a cultural object with shared meaning, it has potential to hold sway in the world as if it were absolute and irrefutable, rather than socially constructed.” we see here it answers the first question I had in this reading and that finding the answer we dive in deeper how we view America and the context within which it is produced and consumed, and what we learn about the United States by studying blackface critically were able to understand that the cultural object of “Blackface” in America as defined in Grazian is “are social expressions of meaning that have been rendered into something tangible or intangible.” Because of the detrimental and false narratives minstrel actors used to feed into the growing pop culture,  exploring these concepts we also learn the importance of a more genuine and accurate representation for African Americans. For example the Williams and Walker company, which was arguably the first to bring postwar black musical theater that contested the cultural ownership of racial representations to the attention of a white mainstream audience. Entering into the 1920s there started to grow more options of employment that was not only restricted to blackface or minstrel shows anymore, but rather many black entertainers would go on to compose classical, ragtime, and jazz music and were recognized as great musicians of their time.

Grazian, David. Mix It up: Popular Culture, Mass Media, and Society. W.W. Norton, 2017.

University of Florida. “Summary of The History of Minstrelsy · USF Library Special & Digital Collections Exhibits.” Omeka RSS, exhibits.lib.usf.edu/exhibits/show/minstrelsy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Critical Book Analysis: Where the girls are by Susan Douglas

Susan Douglas’s “ Where the Girls Are” is a book that captures life from the perspective of a woman growing up in the 1960s, soon after the baby boom generation. Professor Douglas’s purpose for writing this book was to illustrate the role of media depictions in dictating and reinforcing what society believed women should or should not be. She also exposes the conflicting values of what it meant to be a woman in society versus what it means to be American. More specifically, she is highlighting how difficult it was to balance between those two very different ideas and values. Douglas throughout her piece brings light to how the feminist movement came to be, why it was so important to women during that time and analyzed how intersectionality added another layer to it all. Fortunately, today’s sexist behavior is publicly shamed but there is still a lot of passive and subtle sexism that lives on when unchecked. My ultimate takeaway after diving into her piece is that although we have come...

Post#8 Analysis of a 1970s Hollywood Film: Enter The Dragon

This film was created and released in 1973, which would be the last film to ever be released presenting Bruce lee before his untimely passing. Analyzing this movie, I noticed how many of the techniques applied from the Hollywood Trick of lights were still maintained here as presented through unique camera angles and perspectives, manipulating tensions and feelings with light and shadows. Our protagonist "Lee'' is a trainee as well as a teacher in his own right in the Shaolin temple, a martial arts expert, who eventually gets recruited in a operation to take down an narcotic dealer named Han, who not only "perverted" the teachings from the temple, but has garnered an island that practices many illegal activities: brothels, drugs, human experimentation, or as Han would say "a business of corruption". All while taking a stand against Han who was responsible for the death of his sister. It is a rather notable motif that I noticed throughout the film the ver...

Diving Into Deep Reading: Post 2

Each of these podcasts talks about the concept of Deep Reading. Pay special attention to what is meant by deep reading and how it compares perhaps to how you read, or how you were taught to read. In the On Point podcast episode “The Future Of The Reading Brain In An Increasingly Digital World” Podcast host Meghna Chakrabarti interviews Maryanne Wolf, an incoming director of UCLA's Center for Dyslexia, Diverse Learners, and Social Justice Author of "Reader, Come Home: The Reading Brain in a Digital World"  Maryanne closes with wanting to emphasis two main points about deep reading processes with critical analyses and empathy "when we fail to allocate sufficient time to those 2 processes it leads us not to just be susceptible to false news but it leads us to be susceptible to demagoguery with its simple messages of fear and if you do this you will reap the rewards. This is a twitter mentality that reduces the complexities of the issues we need both critical analysis an...