This film was created and released in 1973, which would be the last film to ever be released presenting Bruce lee before his untimely passing. Analyzing this movie, I noticed how many of the techniques applied from the Hollywood Trick of lights were still maintained here as presented through unique camera angles and perspectives, manipulating tensions and feelings with light and shadows. Our protagonist "Lee'' is a trainee as well as a teacher in his own right in the Shaolin temple, a martial arts expert, who eventually gets recruited in a operation to take down an narcotic dealer named Han, who not only "perverted" the teachings from the temple, but has garnered an island that practices many illegal activities: brothels, drugs, human experimentation, or as Han would say "a business of corruption". All while taking a stand against Han who was responsible for the death of his sister. It is a rather notable motif that I noticed throughout the film the very visible choices of colors utilized; yellow, white, black, red, and gold. These colors represented well in juxtapositioning the differences between Han, Han's men, Lee, Williams, and Roper. The more colors the more drowned the character seems in luxury, such as Mr. Han basking in his status as the audience can see based on his clothes, while the henchmen wore white clothing, and martial art participants wore yellow, and Bruce lee wore mostly black.
There is also an unforgettable note that touches upon classism and social issues in the film by showcasing the process of how both Roper and Williams had to go through in order to head to Hong Kong. Roper is held up by three thugs demanding a debt to be paid, but he knocks them out and takes off, whereas for Williams before heading to the airport for Hong Kong, he is stopped by policemen, who try to harass him or arrest him without any grounds resulting in the Williams to defend himself while flashily getting away with their car. As both parties arrived in Hongkong Williams has one bag with him, and we see Roper traveling with many suitcases. Once again portraying the contrast between these two martial artists and their lives as a black man and a white man in the seventies. In chapter six of Grazian states for the need for blockbusters "As one can see, at the input and output boundaries within this organizational system, industry professionals are required to make multiple decisions in a context of uncertainty, in which success is virtually impossible to predict with any reliability." This was a film created by one of the biggest production companies, Warner Bros. Keeping that in mind, when we are referring to Grazian when he enters the discussion for the need of blockbusters, he describes a formulaic plan that is used constantly “The drastic overspending on such film projects only increases the need among studios to produce windfall profits to simply break even, which generates an even greater demand for blockbusters. Taken to its logical conclusion, this cycle of bet- raising resembles an endless round of no- limit gambling,” Despite the passing of the main protagonist, at the end of the day, chapter six highlights the importance of profit when creating a successful earn back from the production to equal to their money’s worth. But what does that mean for the audience? Upon hearing the promotion of “Enter the Dragon” many people showed up to watch the film , Big companies manipulating the viewers emotions who come to support and invest into watching a legacy that has been left behind. But that does not mean that the film in its entirety lacks its meaning, but rather as Grazian has noted in this chapter it’s a consideration to remember who was behind the production and what were the intentions they have, a love letter to honor a past talented individual or to milk the presence of someone as much as they can for profit.
Hello Grace,
ReplyDeleteIn your analysis of the film Enter the Dragon (1973), it is great to recognize the use of colors represented some aspects of martial arts; as can be seen, there was also a range of levels among characters in the film. In addition, the cultural globalization figure Bruce Lee appeared in Hollywood movies could draw the audience's attention to pay out of their pocket to not only see the film but also the presence of a cultural phenomenon. Beside attractive actions and the dark content of social issues, film investment made profit based on the social cultural symbols that were applied in the production side. In Grazian’s words “the importance of profit when creating a successful earn back from the production to equal to their money’s worth;" therefore, the number of audiences not only equalized to financial gain but also promoted a certain cultural symbols. Some viewers could consider Hollywood’s movies as a form of entertainment without realizing the intention behind the screen; however, there was also film analysts who would critique Enter the Dragon from a variety of perspectives.
Thank you for your thought,
Duong
thank you for letting me know! I will definitely consider and note that on more variety of perspectives that you mentioned.
DeleteHey,
ReplyDeleteSince this was Bruce Lee’s final film before his passing, was there any mention from the production crew honoring his death? It makes me wonder like you mentioned at the end, if they took advantage of his fame and death to make a profit off of it or if this was “love letter to honor a past talented individual”.
Hey Alexandra! sorry to get to you late! but from what I am reading/researching it seems that I found a lot more information about the result of the films success and promotions here from Wikipedia
Delete(1)"Enter the Dragon was heavily advertised in the United States before its release. The budget for advertising was over US$1 million. It was unlike any promotional campaign that had been seen before, and was extremely comprehensive. To advertise the film, the studio offered free Karate classes, produced thousands of illustrated flip books, comic books, posters, photographs, and organised dozens of news releases, interviews, and public appearances for the stars. "
(2) "Against a tight budget of $850,000,the film grossed US$100 million upon its initial 1973 worldwide release, making it one of the world's highest-grossing films of all time up until then"
But overall it seems kinda 50/50 for example, one could say his name was just "used" by profiting off his culture or one could say that after his death, he has an undeniable impact that united and influenced many people and generations with his passion for martial arts, leaving a legacy that no one could ever replicate and is also credited with helping to change the way Asians were presented in American films.
Hey,
ReplyDeleteSince this was Bruce Lee’s final film before his passing, was there any mention from the production crew honoring his death? It makes me wonder like you mentioned at the end, if they took advantage of his fame and death to make a profit off of it or if this was “love letter to honor a past talented individual”.